The Library of Congress holds over 121,000 oral histories. Many of them weren't recorded by historians or journalists. They were recorded by ordinary families — children interviewing grandparents, veterans telling their stories to their kids, neighbours capturing the memories of the people next door.
StoryCorps, which has recorded over 700,000 conversations since 2003, has shown that some of the most culturally significant recordings come from kitchen tables, living rooms, and phone calls between people who simply decided that these stories mattered enough to preserve.
Isay, D. (Ed.) (2007). Listening Is an Act of Love: A Celebration of American Life from the StoryCorps Project. Penguin Press.Preserving your family's stories is not a niche hobby. It's a practice endorsed by some of the world's most respected cultural institutions — and it's more accessible now than at any point in history.
What oral history actually is
Oral history sounds formal, but the concept is simple: it's the practice of recording, preserving, and interpreting first-person accounts of events and experiences. The Oral History Association, which sets professional standards for the field, defines it as a method of gathering and preserving historical information through recorded conversations.
Oral History Association (2018). Principles and Best Practices for Oral History. Revised edition.At its core, oral history is about listening. It's about asking someone to tell their story and giving them the space to do it. The Smithsonian has published a free guide to conducting family oral history interviews, covering everything from question frameworks to basic recording techniques.
Hunt, M. (2003). The Smithsonian Folklife and Oral History Interviewing Guide. Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage.The field has expanded significantly over the past two decades, moving from institutional and academic settings to grassroots practice. As historian Donald Ritchie documents, oral history is no longer the exclusive domain of professionals — it's something families do.
Ritchie, D.A. (2014). Doing Oral History. Oxford University Press, 3rd edition.Why family stories matter more than facts
There's an important distinction between family history and family stories. History is dates, names, places — the genealogical record. Stories are the texture of a life: the way someone handled a crisis, the joke they always told, the values they lived by without ever stating them explicitly.
Both are valuable. But stories carry something that facts alone cannot: meaning. When you know that your grandmother walked three miles to school in rural Ireland, that's a fact. When you know that she told that story every time one of her grandchildren complained about homework — and that she always ended it with a wink — that's a story. The difference matters.
The Veterans History Project at the Library of Congress was established in 2000 specifically because the institution recognised that first-person accounts — stories told by the people who lived them — contain something that official records don't capture.
How to start
The barrier to preserving family stories isn't equipment or expertise. It's inertia. Most families intend to record their stories "someday" and never quite get around to it. Here's a practical approach:
Start with one person. Don't try to capture everyone's stories at once. Pick one family member — ideally an older relative — and ask them to share a few memories. Even a single recorded conversation is infinitely more than nothing.
Use specific prompts. "Tell me about your life" is overwhelming. "What's the funniest thing Grandpa ever did?" is answerable. The Smithsonian guide and StoryCorps both provide curated question lists designed to elicit rich, detailed stories.
Record, don't just listen. The human mind forgets. Even the stories you've heard dozens of times will fade once the person who tells them is gone. Recording — audio or video — preserves not just the content but the voice, the emotion, the way they tell it.
Don't wait for the perfect moment. Family gatherings, phone calls, quiet afternoons — any of these can become an opportunity. The best family oral histories aren't formal interviews. They're conversations that someone decided to capture.
Make it easy for others to contribute. If family members are spread across different cities or countries, find a way to collect their stories remotely. The easier you make it for people to participate, the more voices you'll capture.
The institutions that study this — the Smithsonian, the Library of Congress, StoryCorps — all emphasise the same point: the biggest risk isn't doing it imperfectly. It's not doing it at all.
The modern challenge
The irony of our era is that we have more recording technology in our pockets than any generation in history, yet family story preservation is declining. Families are more geographically scattered. Multi-generational households are less common. The natural opportunities for storytelling — long meals, shared chores, idle afternoons — have shrunk.
This doesn't mean the stories are less important. It means we need to be more intentional about capturing them. The practice is the same one that families have followed for thousands of years. The tools are just different.
The Library of Congress doesn't archive family stories because they're charming. It archives them because they're irreplaceable. Every family has stories worth preserving. The question is whether someone in your family will decide to capture them before they're gone.
Collect the stories people carry about someone you love.
Their Story makes it easy for friends and family to record short audio memories, turning them into a lasting digital keepsake.